to mark the release of our white paper ‘’, on 5th september we hosted a panel of industry experts at our to discuss the issues of online hate, and how brands can do more to protect and support their online communities. our writer, , shares some of the key takeaways from the morning.

the panel was led by our head of editorial, , who played host to , chief operating officer at the mandy network; , head of campaign strategy (this girl can) at sport england; , director of marketing at pride in london; and , director of itv creative & itv experiences at itv and co-chair of itv pride.

all of our panellists were in agreement: brands need to do more when it comes to policing the hate that appears on their social feeds. as kate dale put it, “if you have created a space, and you’ve created that conversation, you have a responsibility to the people that come to that platform.”

but a surprising amount are silent when it comes to responding. in fact, only 11.3% of brands said they responded to negative comments, and 88.7% said they would ignore them. on social media, the conversation needs to be much more community-based. “when we ignore our community”, dale said “we tell them we’re not willing to fight for them. we’ll use the benefits of the community, but we won’t support them.”

how do brands make a change?
iain walters of pride in london emphasised that brands need to make a genuine connection with their community when looking to build better channels of communicating. “shallow diversity is the worst kind… [the community] feels right when it’s been built from the inside out. it feels wrong when it’s done in a shallow way. just putting a pride flag up isn’t enough.”

susie hanlon said representation has to come from within a brand. “if you don’t have the right reflection of people’s voices in the workforce, how can you represent them? we’re supposed to reflect our communities in our organisation, but we’re not doing so.”

kate dale pointed out “a tokenistic ‘tell me about your community’ line of questioning can appear exploitative”. it’s all about actually showing genuine interest in your communities’ opinions and then making decisions based on what they tell you.

what about when things go wrong?
it’s not uncommon for issues to escalate and get out of hand when you’re dealing with people online, but it can be hard to read context and evaluate the situation. “when does an argument turn into something more?” asked iain walters, “a lot of brands ignore it and preach ‘free speech’. if you ignore it, then you give the community up to the haters. if you engage and solve the problem then you can empower the community. you have a responsibility to judge.”

kate dale echoed his sentiments, stating that brands can do well by “owning the playground” and managing people’s expectations of how the community should behave. iain went on to say that preparation was the key. brands spend so much on planning campaigns, marketing, strategies – and they should do the same for their diversity model. “plan, so you are aware of what will happen during execution, how you will look after the community you’ve built, and make sure you’re prepared for afterwards. it’s not something you do as an afterthought.” part of that planning comes in the form of creating robust anti-hate policies for your brand, and sticking to them.

why do companies need anti-hate policies?
online hate presents itself in three forms: the kind that breaches platforms’ guidelines and, in extreme cases, breaks the law; the kind that voices unfavourable or critical opinions about the brands, that should be left alone; and the complicated grey area between free speech and hate speech. it’s this third area that our whitepaper hopes to help guide brands through, by teaching them how to draw up anti-hate policies. we asked our panel why so few companies have these policies in place, why those that do rarely enforce them, and why they’re so important in today’s social media?

susie hanlon says it’s imperative for brands to have such guidelines in place. without them, it’s like holding an ‘open mic’ session and letting people say whatever they like in your space. in your purpose-built community, that shouldn’t be allowed.

how should brands prepare for the backlash?
matt scarff talked more about how guidelines and planning helped when itv unveiled a sculpture supporting project 84, an initiative that highlighted the growing number of male suicides. “we understood our response rates, we had support for those phoning in. we had moderators evaluating if people needed more support based on the messages we were receiving. if you plan it well and have the right people in place, you can do so much more.”

with planning, you can make sure your whole team in empowered to handle hateful speech, our ‘braving the backlash’ report details our three ‘r’s model, [remain, reply or report]. this is a methodology that allows you to identify hateful comments, to understand the right proportional response needed and to take the appropriate action.

in many ways things are beginning to change. people are becoming more conscious of how they behave online and those who don’t face more real-world consequences. companies are hiring a more diverse workforce in order to have a wider representation of people within their walls, with systems in place to ensure that continues and grows. more brands are connecting with their communities on a much more genuine level. but the work isn’t done.

to download a copy of ‘braving the backlash’ head over to .